Review: Witchstruck by Victoria Lamb

WitchstruckTitle: Witchstruck

Author: Victoria Lamb

Genre: Historical, YA Paranormal, Witches

Publication Date: September 24, 2013 (Harlequin Teen)

Source: eARC from the publisher via NetGalley

Synopsis: If she sink, she be no witch and shall be drowned. If she float, she be a witch and must be hanged.

Meg Lytton has always known she is different;that she bears a dark and powerful gift. But in 1554 England, in service at Woodstock Palace to the banished Tudor princess Elizabeth, it has never been more dangerous to practice witchcraft. Meg knows she must guard her secret carefully from the many suspicious eyes watching over the princess and her companions. One wrong move could mean her life, and the life of Elizabeth, rightful heir to the English throne.

With witchfinder Marcus Dent determined to have Meg’s hand in marriage, and Meg’s own family conspiring against the English queen, there isn’t a single person Meg can trust. Certainly not the enigmatic young Spanish priest Alejandro de Castillo, despite her undeniable feelings. But when all the world turns against her, Meg must open her heart to a dangerous choice.

The Secret Circle meets The Other Boleyn Girl in Witchstruck ,the first book of the magical Tudor Witch trilogy.

2.5/5 stars – The longer it goes on, the more the romance takes over

Witchcraft alongside the intrigue of Tudor-era England sounds fun, right? According to most of the reviews, it is. I can agree with that! Sadly, the most entertaining elements of Witchstruck fall by the wayside and can do very little to redeem this ultimately frustrating novel.

Most Tudor-era YA historicals are set during King Henry VIII’s reign, but Lamb sets it during Princess Elizabeth’s confinement  in 1555/1556. I honestly thought this was AU at first because I had no idea about it! A good Tudor-era scholar I am not. Despite the frustrations that slowly built up as the novel went on, it’s easy to care a lot about where Meg and her story are going, especially since female friendships/the powers and rights of women are thoroughly emphasized. Most of the characters are merely okay, but Elizabeth shines in all of her appearances. If only it were the same for Meg and Alejandro, our main characters.

Alejandro is by far the more grating of the two as he falls in love with Meg over the course of 70 pages and a handful of conversations. After that, a choppy time-skip tells us Meg has gotten closer to him, she loves how he’s such a good conversationalist, etc. and we’re expected to take this poor relationship development as-is. Not in this house! The development he gets closer to the end is appreciated, but it’s not enough to make up for everything that bothers me about his character.

Meg is the textbook “okay” heroine. She has something of a personality, she doesn’t hate other women, she’s admirably loyal to Princess Elizabeth, and all the mistakes she makes are forgivable. Sounds good, right? Yet her heavily flawed first-person narration makes it easy to let the flaws of the prose reflect back on her.

One of her worst narrative sins is how maddeningly repetitive she is. She thoroughly details why she hates Marcus Dent twice in a single chapter and tells us a few details about a person but then proceeds to repeat those few details about them almost every single time they come up. It almost seems like she thinks the reader has about as much memory as a dead bird. As if we could easily forget Marcus is a cruel, wealthy man and Joan is the simple girl who called Meg a witch after bringing them up so many times!

The ending’s deus ex machina with Meg’s sudden superwitch powers after surprisingly little witchery beforehand eased few of my issues and doesn’t encourage me to stick around for Witchfall. It’s easy to recommend to fans of Jessica Spotswood’s books and anyone who unabashedly loves witches, but others may want to be cautious.

4 thoughts on “Review: Witchstruck by Victoria Lamb

  1. Eek. I’m not so sure about Witchstruck anymore – repetitive monologues and not-so-good romance isn’t really my thing, and as I’m not an unabashedly in love with witch stories and Jessica Spotwood’s novels, maybe something else? Great review!

  2. I saw this as an option on NetGalley, but didn’t click it. The premise is interesting, but repetitiveness and bad romance is ugh. I’m glad I passed up on requesting it. Thanks so much for the review!

  3. I’m not a Tudor scholar by any means either, but, yeah, that’s awesome that she went for a different time period. That’s also a big part of why I liked Gilt better than Tarnish. Even looking at the era of another wife is rare compared to Anne Boleyn.

    Meh. I thought this sounded awesome, but I was afraid of it. For a reason, apparently. I’m glad it was still partly enjoyable, but ehhhhh. No.

    • I’ve got Gilt on my Kindle and I’m still feeling unsure about it, but I think it will be another year or two before I actually have time to read it. I have too many books and just keep getting more, but I don’t give a damn. On the bright side, the ending and some of the revelations I came across toward said ending bumped the rating up a little. Without those, this would have been a 1.5 or 2-star book.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s